Research question
Can stable logical observables be defined through resonance and detector thresholds rather than hard-coded gates?
MODEL SCOPE
Public model description
A 64×64 dissipative coupled-phase lattice is driven with controlled phase offsets and additive noise. Detector amplitude and threshold define the logical observable; in-phase and π-shifted inputs encode distinct response classes.
PROTOCOL
Declared evidence chain
Phase-conditioned AND/XOR-like cases, detector thresholds, noise levels, spectral response, and a Grover-type amplification analogy are compared to locate both working and failure regimes.
Series: 64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes
- 64×64 field
- resonant gates
- detector metrics
- noise regimes
The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.
EVIDENCE
Results inside the model
INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS
Detector-defined logic lens
A phase-response view of detector thresholds, in-phase input, a controlled π offset, and noise-induced loss of classification.
The controlled phase offset produces a distinct converged response.
- Logical output is operationally defined by detector thresholds.
- In-phase and π-shifted inputs produce distinct convergence regimes in the model.
- Noise and threshold sweeps expose where the classification ceases to be stable.
BOUNDARY
CLAIM BOUNDARY
- 01Declared numerical protocol
64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes
- 02Supported model-level finding
Logical output is operationally defined by detector thresholds.
- Claim boundary
- 03Requires a separate validation chain
The work demonstrates simulated field responses, not a physical logic device or quantum implementation. Detector-defined logic can also encode modelling choices and requires independent comparison with conventional baselines.
Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.
Publication record
- Author
- Nikita Teslia
- Programme
- Foundational systems
- Claim type
- Simulation study
- Year
- 2025
- Dossier review
- Series
- 64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes
- License
- Custom license notice in the supplied PDF
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.15669818
Citation
Teslia, N. (2025). Emergent Logical Structures in Resonant Field Dynamics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15669818Open publication recordThe DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.
PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY
Research lineage
Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.