PUBLIC EVIDENCE DOSSIER

V4Foundational systems2025UNDER REVISION

Simulation study

Emergent Logical Structures in Resonant Field Dynamics

V4 tests whether phase-conditioned field responses can be classified as logical outputs. Detector thresholds distinguish AND/XOR-like cases, while noise and threshold changes expose unstable classifications. The result concerns simulated responses and the chosen detector; the historical interpretation is under revision.

Status reviewed on 5 September 2026. The historical publication remains available; its updated interpretation is still in progress. No revision start date is asserted.

V4
EVIDENCE MODE
Numerical study
SCOPE
CLAIM-BOUNDED
Publication
Public publication · DOI
01QUESTION

Research question

Can stable logical observables be defined through resonance and detector thresholds rather than hard-coded gates?

02MODEL

MODEL SCOPE

Public model description

A 64×64 dissipative coupled-phase lattice is driven with controlled phase offsets and additive noise. Detector amplitude and threshold define the logical observable; in-phase and π-shifted inputs encode distinct response classes.

03EXPERIMENT

PROTOCOL

Declared evidence chain

Phase-conditioned AND/XOR-like cases, detector thresholds, noise levels, spectral response, and a Grover-type amplification analogy are compared to locate both working and failure regimes.

Series: 64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes

  • 64×64 field
  • resonant gates
  • detector metrics
  • noise regimes

The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.

04RESULT

EVIDENCE

Results inside the model

64×64Dissipative phase lattice
πControlled phase offset
AND / XORDetector-defined responses

INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS

Detector-defined logic lens

A phase-response view of detector thresholds, in-phase input, a controlled π offset, and noise-induced loss of classification.

NORMALIZED EXPLANATORY VIEW
Active stateπ offset

The controlled phase offset produces a distinct converged response.

Geometry, intensity, timing, and motion in this lens are normalized explanatory encodings. They are not experimental measurements. Published aggregates remain in the evidence signals and source figure.
  1. Logical output is operationally defined by detector thresholds.
  2. In-phase and π-shifted inputs produce distinct convergence regimes in the model.
  3. Noise and threshold sweeps expose where the classification ceases to be stable.
05CLAIM BOUNDARY

BOUNDARY

CLAIM BOUNDARY

  1. 01
    Declared numerical protocol

    64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes

  2. 02
    Supported model-level finding

    Logical output is operationally defined by detector thresholds.

  3. Claim boundary
  4. 03
    Requires a separate validation chain

    The work demonstrates simulated field responses, not a physical logic device or quantum implementation. Detector-defined logic can also encode modelling choices and requires independent comparison with conventional baselines.

Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.

06PUBLICATION

Publication record

Author
Nikita Teslia
Programme
Foundational systems
Claim type
Simulation study
Year
2025
Dossier review
Series
64×64 field · resonant gates · detector metrics · noise regimes
License
Custom license notice in the supplied PDF
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.15669818

Citation

Teslia, N. (2025). Emergent Logical Structures in Resonant Field Dynamics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15669818Open publication record

The DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.

PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY

Research lineage

Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.

FIELDSTABLE