Research question
How stable are reproduced field structures across time windows, scale, competition, noise, and parameter optimisation?
MODEL SCOPE
Public model description
A three-dimensional lattice is observed through energy, meta-node, trajectory-deviation, correlation, integrity, collapse-time, and fitness metrics.
PROTOCOL
Declared evidence chain
V8.1–V8.6 test retention across time windows, replica fidelity, multi-agent exchange, scaling, noise, and evolutionary parameter search. Reported optima remain tied to the selected objective function.
Series: V8.1–V8.6 · retention · diplomacy · stress · optimisation
- V8.1–V8.6
- retention
- diplomacy
- stress
- optimisation
The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.
EVIDENCE
Results inside the model
INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS
Stability-window lens
A bounded view of the selected stability window, the reported noise threshold, and model-level optimisation of persistence.
The selected model window is 0.88 < α < 0.93.
- The reported mass–area scaling exponent is approximately 1.27.
- The selected stability window is 0.88 < α < 0.93, with a reported noise threshold σc ≈ 0.18.
- The genetic search reports about a 20% improvement in Pstable within the model.
BOUNDARY
CLAIM BOUNDARY
- 01Declared numerical protocol
V8.1–V8.6 · retention · diplomacy · stress · optimisation
- 02Supported model-level finding
The reported mass–area scaling exponent is approximately 1.27.
- Claim boundary
- 03Requires a separate validation chain
These quantities are internal to the selected simulation and objective function. The report does not establish a universal scaling law, physical cognitive medium, or transferable engineering optimum.
Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.
Publication record
- Author
- Nikita Teslia
- Programme
- Foundational systems
- Claim type
- Simulation study
- Year
- 2025
- Dossier review
- Series
- V8.1–V8.6 · retention · diplomacy · stress · optimisation
- License
- Code of the Architect ethical constraints in the supplied PDF
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.15813816
Citation
Teslia, N. (2025). Phase-Locked Quantum-Plasma Processor V8 Demonstrations and Analysis. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15813816Open publication recordThe DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.
PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY
Research lineage
Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.