Research question
Can resonance, nonlinear confinement, density feedback, and plasticity generate useful computational observables without explicit gate logic?
MODEL SCOPE
Public model description
The computational substrate combines Kuramoto-like oscillator coupling with a 20×20 spatial phase field, quartic confinement, density feedback, a plastic memory channel, and mask-based readout.
PROTOCOL
Declared evidence chain
The report moves from ensemble locking to spatial-field stabilisation, spectral readout, memory formation, and corrupted-pattern recovery. The 15% corruption case is retained even though its reported accuracy sharply limits the recall claim.
Series: Oscillator locking · 2D field · memory · readout · case studies
- Oscillator locking
- 2D field
- memory
- readout
- case studies
The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.
EVIDENCE
Results inside the model
INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS
Coupled-field mode lens
A spatial explanation of oscillator locking, a dominant field mode, and mask-based memory readout in the V2 substrate.
A coherent spatial mode becomes visible after field stabilisation.
- The oscillator ensemble reaches frequency locking in the reported setup.
- A dominant spatial FFT mode appears after field stabilisation.
- The report gives 50.1% accuracy in the 15%-corruption case; V2R withdraws its interpretation as recovery because the corrupted input itself remains 85% accurate.
BOUNDARY
CLAIM BOUNDARY
- 01Declared numerical protocol
Oscillator locking · 2D field · memory · readout · case studies
- 02Supported model-level finding
The oscillator ensemble reaches frequency locking in the reported setup.
- Claim boundary
- 03Requires a separate validation chain
This archived proposal is not the current interpretive authority. Its missing closure laws prevent literal reconstruction, and it does not validate a physical substrate, scaling, or computational advantage; consult V2R before carrying any V2 claim forward.
Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.
Publication record
- Author
- Nikita Teslia
- Programme
- Archive
- Claim type
- Simulation study
- Year
- 2025
- Dossier review
- Series
- Oscillator locking · 2D field · memory · readout · case studies
- License
- See publication record
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.15653010
Citation
Teslia, N. (2025). Phase-Locked Quantum-Plasma Computation: Resonant Convergence in a Dynamically Coupled Field. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15653010Open publication recordThe DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.
PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY
Research lineage
Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.