Research question
Which parts of V1 survive literal numerical audit, which require declared surrogate closures or a standard replacement, which fail, and which remain open?
MODEL SCOPE
Public model description
The revision separates three declared classical-surrogate branches - an uncoupled nonlinear-oscillator null model, a first-order phase-lock model, and an inertial phase extension - from a separate finite-Hilbert open-system audit. The unresolved plasma free-energy term remains symbolic rather than being silently closed.
PROTOCOL
Declared evidence chain
V1R.1-V1R.11.1 apply null-before-mechanism controls, drive/coupling/detuning ablations, finite-horizon gates, Jacobian and monodromy comparisons, shock and noise-disorder stress, literal dissipator testing, a separately declared GKSL replacement, resolution transfer, and exact-versus-scientific reproducibility checks.
Series: V1R.1–V1R.11.1 · 13 public audit stages · 33 curated figures
- V1R.1–V1R.11.1
- 13 public audit stages
- 33 curated figures
The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.
EVIDENCE
Results inside the model
INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS
Revision-audit lens
A claim-bounded view of the declared V1 skeleton, the surviving classical benchmark, and the branch that fails or is replaced under audit.
Declared classical surrogates support bounded locking, stability, recovery, and robustness results.
- The declared classical surrogate family supports bounded finite-horizon resonance locking, local spectral stability, periodic parametric instability, recovery, and noise-disorder survival boundaries across the audited transfers.
- The pre-specified phase-feedback contribution gate fails, and no tested non-zero instantaneous signed phase-feedback setting yields a reproducible benefit.
- The literal V1 Eq. (7) dissipator fails the finite-dimensional physicality audit; a separately declared standard GKSL replacement preserves the required open-system properties in the tested branch.
BOUNDARY
CLAIM BOUNDARY
- 01Declared numerical protocol
V1R.1–V1R.11.1 · 13 public audit stages · 33 curated figures
- 02Supported model-level finding
The declared classical surrogate family supports bounded finite-horizon resonance locking, local spectral stability, periodic parametric instability, recovery, and noise-disorder survival boundaries across the audited transfers.
- Claim boundary
- 03Requires a separate validation chain
V1R does not establish a quantum-plasma processor, quantum advantage, a closed plasma Hamiltonian, microscopic plasma-bath coupling, Rydberg implementation, device feasibility, or computation of external problem instances. Public equations omit reconstruction-enabling settings and records.
Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.
Publication record
- Author
- Nikita Teslia
- Programme
- Foundational systems
- Claim type
- Numerical evidence ledger
- Year
- 2026
- Series
- V1R.1–V1R.11.1 · 13 public audit stages · 33 curated figures
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.21976861
Citation
Teslia, N. (2026). V1R: Phase-Locked Quantum-Plasma Processor Revisited. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21976861Open publication recordThe DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.
PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY
Research lineage
Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.