01
Research question
Can a closed-loop controller find and retain a robust operating basin while detecting drift and recovering from degraded states?
02
Method and experiment series
Nine stages progress from power-balance baselines and parameter scans to closed-loop ω/φ/d tuning, validation tails, CUSUM drift detection, a warm-start statebook, rollback, and panic safeguards.
Series: P1.1–P1.9 · ω/φ/d control · drift · recovery · safety
03
Key results
- The report maps candidate locking/through-flow basins before enabling control.
- Validation tails and rollback constrain acceptance of online parameter updates.
- CUSUM and the statebook provide model-level drift detection and recovery in the resilient mode.
04
What is not established
This is a controller study in a normalized driven–dissipative field. It does not establish net thrust, propulsive efficiency, a working engine, or compliance with conservation and full fluid/plasma physics in hardware.
This work is a numerical proof-of-concept. It establishes model-level behaviour under the stated assumptions and does not replace independent laboratory validation.